引用:
原帖由 溫順強 于 2006-10-22 16:55 发表
I must thank Sandakanbest (UID:171) for responding so fast on my thread but I'm sorry to say you haven't answer my question.
Preserve is one thing but now I'm talking whether the demolition of S ...
Better protection for Sabah's historical monuments and artefacts
15 Aug 2006
Joniston Bangkuai at the Sabah Legislative Assembly
KOTA KINABALU, Tues: SABAH's historical monuments, buildings and
artefacts would now be better protected with the approval of an
amendment to the Antiquities and Treasure Trove Enactment 1977.
The amendment, among others, provide for a stiffer penalty against
offenders and empowering the State Museum Director to appoint
enforcement officers.
Those found guilty of destroying or damaging historical monuments or
buildings are now liable to a fine not exceeding RM50,000 or
imprisonment not exceeding five years or both.
Previously, the penalty for such an offence was a fine of RM2,000 or
imprisonment for one year.
The penalty for those found to be in illegal possession of ancient
artefacts have been enhanced from a fine of RM1,000 or three times the
market value of the antiquity to a fine not exceeding RM50,000 or
imprisonment not exceeding five years.
Tabling the Bill for the amendment, Assistant Tourism, Culture and
Environment Minister Datuk Karim Bujang said it is now mandatory for
ancient monuments or historical sites to be kept in a state of good
repair by their owners.
__________________________________________________________________________
my answer.........since the Sandakan old market may not be officially gazzeted as historical building under Sabah State Museum.... so it is not illegal to demolish it because that building is not officialy gazzeted as historical building.....
[
本帖最后由 Sandakanbest 于 2006-10-22 05:15 PM 编辑 ]
